Nexus: washka's threedy ones (and some nudity)

[washka]

And some other color stuff:

[washka]

Same:

[washka]

And yes, for old forum buddy only I'm on da big network now... => Louis Planche



I don't like social pressure, formatting of thought or behaviours and media monopole. A braave new woooorld.
But never say never...

[washka]

If you remember this one:


I did some lill' & sweet horror from it:

[washka]

Behelit V2:

[ignacio197]

I like your latest addition. Not sure what it is, but he is cool If its a matter of versions, I prefer the one on the right. The character stands out a bit more.

[washka]

Thanks ignacio197

v1 => here

In previous post Luffie's Berserk fanart's some nicez piece.

[washka]

This one isn't digital, it's my first oil painting
For more WIP details, working steps are on my blog. Title is "The Scarecrow", it was finished yesterday morning 21th of may 2012 for a material painting contest.
C&C always appreciated, enjoy:

[terry1337]

AWesome parrot^^ i really like the vivid colours so bright sweet keep it uP

[ignacio197]

It has the same kind of feeling as your digital paintings but you can tell the brush strokes here are not as freely applied. The combination of shapes, colours, contrast and strokes you have on the digital ones are very characteristic, and are not showing fully here. I did it the other way around, I have many acrylic, pastels and oil paintings from the past 20 years and went digital about a year ago. I can tell on myself, how I am more careless and try many more things with digital painting, which in turn translates into more interesting things (at last sometimes). With traditional media I am always afraid of making mistakes or trying new things, because it takes a long time to fix them, sometimes you cant even fix them

I guess it will come with practice, but if you manage to get on oil what you have digitally, I think you can get some very interesting stuff. I would say is a good start!

[washka]

Originally Posted by ignacio197

It has the same kind of feeling as your digital paintings but you can tell the brush strokes here are not as freely applied. The combination of shapes, colours, contrast and strokes you have on the digital ones are very characteristic, and are not showing fully here. I did it the other way around, I have many acrylic, pastels and oil paintings from the past 20 years and went digital about a year ago. I can tell on myself, how I am more careless and try many more things with digital painting, which in turn translates into more interesting things (at last sometimes). With traditional media I am always afraid of making mistakes or trying new things, because it takes a long time to fix them, sometimes you cant even fix them

I guess it will come with practice, but if you manage to get on oil what you have digitally, I think you can get some very interesting stuff. I would say is a good start!

True, hopefully oil can move a bit.

I think that's why digital's got its strong points, with digital you're 100% unconstrained, It means you can correct every mistakes.
I like to do mistakes on digital painting, then use those.

-Considering 3D/material and light aspect too, you can make quite any kind of simulation, anything virtual is 100% "free of materialistic charge".
In bravehearth the hero says: "FREEDOM!".
-Except time/code/calculus and soft/hardware/interface ressource...
(Da machine and the all included=> can be everything)

Unlike 70-80% of digital painters, I mean the majority, I do not deprive myself of mistakes.
It takes time, it isn't profitable in short term, so industry doesn't care.
But sometimes you can learn more from mistakes than from the classic rail, but this kind of approach kills the "technique market".
The "technique market" is got fixed standards. Those standards have usually some points, not always. I think the technique market is important too, it allows exchanges, learning, and the enrichment of values.
I think too much people are just englued on it, on pure technique, mastering techniques add to your "skills" but this is not all, I think you've to use it to take off, to go a step further, you know like a springboard. Don't stay englued, take off, giving from yourself.

In contrast to this rich technique market (I think that during the last 25 years, on digital media, the technique approach has been gaining in wealth, in quality (level of details and effects), in diversity, so it allows nice pannels and there is an expressivity and information gain) the approach is deseperatly the same everywhere and f*cking poor, some old veteran go a bit outside da mass, but the majority stay on da formatted "net", they all do the same things. Sometimes you've got some nice surprises, quite rare.

About colors I prefer real colors than digital, I prefer colors on printed digital than on screen ones, I prefer light reflected on a solid media than light created from a screen (even if it's quite da same mechanistic inside).

But hopefully, I can go from digital to traditional media, and from traditional media to digital, isn't da world great?

[washka]

I did it the other way around, I have many acrylic, pastels and oil paintings from the past 20 years and went digital about a year ago.

It's funny how ways cross.
Maybe after that, in a few years, you'll go on traditional again, with some more freedom.

[ignacio197]

That is my hope, that after some time in the digital world I will be able to loosen up and take something with me to the traditional world Although I have to admit, I am liking the digital world more than I would have thought .......

[washka]

Speedie for circus contest.

[washka]

I'm not dead yet.