|
|||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 82
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
chopper wip
working on a chopper right now, ~1700polys
c&c welcome |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: on my ship
Posts: 199
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
oh my god
thats so bad, what did you make it in? ugg show a wire frame ugg, no paint textures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 920
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Eh, a chopper has 2 or 4 propellers on the top, not 8.
Show some support john silver.
__________________
A SIG? I DON'T CARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: netherlands
Posts: 80
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
he has 4 propellers. Or am I counting wrong
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Although the 2 or 4 bit isnt strictly to every helicopter, for the type of helicopter (i think) your modelling, it should be two-blade based:
I agree with snap about showing more support, however it would be good to see an unpainted/textured version of the aircraft and wireframe to allow us to help you out further. You seem to have some very round cylinders, if this is for a game you might want to have a look into reducing the poly count atm, but the only real way i can suggest anything to reduce the count is from a wireframe. I'd suggest having a look at the main blades, sorting something out with a propeller on the tail and tweaking the "legs" of the helichopper so that they connect smoothly without overlap. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: on my ship
Posts: 199
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
okay i'm sorry
but that's sooooo... awful, i just can't help myself. i thought my helicopter from about a year ago was bad but this, i seen barely worse autocad helicopters. go read some tutorials, or somthing, do research, read the 3ds max bible, or something, anything to improve those skills, they're there just biuld on what you know and read a lot. I have found that just doing research on 3dt and in books has helped me a lot, rather then slugging it out in the trenches, I tended to learn things wrong by just doing it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 170
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: okay i'm sorry
Quote:
__________________
"Say what?" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 82
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
its some ass alright
thanks for the harsh crits guys
i think ill go back to the lab and work on this bad boy a little bit more |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Latvia
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
much more
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
pianist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 873
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
john silver: it's soooooooooo.....awful, I just can't help myself...seriously, that chopper sucks ass, it's almost as bad as thejackal's (no offense man) PLUS it ain't low poly...If you want to set an example of how a chopper should look, post something proper, not some **** you did a year ago...lol, take your own advice
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Cookiefreak
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lund, Sweden
Posts: 666
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Really that is a bit high poly for the shape you have there. I got a suggestion for you. Try n block out the shape of a Hi.lo with as FEW polys as you possybly can. Don't mind if it ends up looking like a peice of crap just mind the plycount. You should be able to get away with under 200. Just make it boxy as hell but still being able to see that it is a chopper. Thenstart to cut in details. Slowley but not too much. Work your way up like that. If you do it wrong do it again. I know this may sound like a pain in the ass and..it is. But there is no better way to learn then pratice and do it alot.
!Heres one I did quickley to show u what I mean. I used spline triangles and just added cross section modifier and surface at 0 segments n then made into polys. It consists of 128 triangles. ![]()
__________________
"Stop looking at me...you cookie freak! |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 82
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
cylinders eh?
heres an update, down to ~848tris
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Cookiefreak
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lund, Sweden
Posts: 666
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Don't like that maya interface...change it
!!!Looks MUCH better :d! Very very nice !
__________________
"Stop looking at me...you cookie freak! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 82
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
huh?
why do you not like the maya interface? personally having upgraded from max 3.1 to maya i have never looked back
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Cookiefreak
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lund, Sweden
Posts: 666
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Was a bit of a joke me being the max evangelist and all. I have looked into maya a bit mut I still preffer max in many ways when it comes to modelling and shaders. And 3.1 is very different from 5.1
! Maya has some advantages of course. It's always like that. When I have time I will try n learn Maya some more. Seems its the tool to know these days but that depends of course on what you want to work with. Knowing more then one of the softwares izn't a bad thing either !
__________________
"Stop looking at me...you cookie freak! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|