|
|||||
|
|
#1 |
|
withego
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Thailand
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Sorry guys if I post the same old scenes again, but is just to show that without AO, Mental Ray is not less than VRAY for architectural visualizations!
Hope you like it better than the old one! Ciao! Alex PS.Should be my last posts for a while! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 218
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
... not realy better than vray. Lots of bad light bleeding through corners. Noise, Reflections that dont blurr correctly. Lack of a good color bounce.
Good scene, just, mental ray is not as good as vray. BTW, i modled that Teapot before. Whe'red you get yours? I had to modle mine from an image from a magazine that was about ... .25inches by .25 inches if even. Is the thing at the tip actualy a bird? I made a bird shape hoping it was. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Not a zombie.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: P-town
Posts: 1,547
Thanks: 7
Thanked 32 Times in 20 Posts
|
They both have their strong points. MR handles raytracer elements superbly, while vray isn’t that great. Vray on the other hand has vastly better photonic lighting then MR.
In regards to the scene it’s nicely done, some elements look flat though(clock, light switches). There’s a dead space in the middle of the composition, a table in the foreground or something would help. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 86
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
If you used Maya , mental ray is just as good as Vray . 3DMax is another story.
Nice done with mental ray , how about render time ? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|