|
|||||
|
|
#61 | |
|
Reputation beyond repute
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,612
Thanks: 136
Thanked 144 Times in 116 Posts
|
Quote:
2. you dont. you have to fake it like XYZ did. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 531
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
ok, it worked, but now it crashes everytime I apply a meshsmooth
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Reputation beyond repute
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,612
Thanks: 136
Thanked 144 Times in 116 Posts
|
what you do is, apply the meshsmooth with a value of 0, but turn the render value to whatever. Then it should work.
Or dont use a meshsmooth at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
(0;0;0)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 292
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
saber, try to do the morpher with a simple mesh, after you finish animating and all, you can add a mesh smooth,, maybe your mesh has too many polygons,, or do wat big-toe-3dt says,, it should work.
,, I'm not sure I'm going to use the morpher when they split,, It will be too hard to morph and animate 5 or 6 bubles at the same time.. each one splitting from the same or identical wax objects. Last edited by XYZ; 10-06-2006 at 12:55 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
chamferophile
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
1st try
Last edited by d3m0ni0; 10-06-2006 at 01:20 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 531
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
thx for all the help already, now all goes fine till frame 101, that's where mesh1 turns invisible and mesh2 shows up. My pc doesn't seem te manage, it always crashes there
bummer |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
chamferophile
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
2nd try
I managed to get something also with blob mesh, here's the video:
>> Download XVID Video << So, if I understand well, if i keyframe particles that's fine for the competition? |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | ||
|
Reputation beyond repute
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,612
Thanks: 136
Thanked 144 Times in 116 Posts
|
Quote:
Are you rendering this out when the crash happens? If so, try rendering out numbered stills. That way you can render up to 100, then after is crashes, start a new render from 101. Put it into affter effects or the like, and it will import as a movie, putting it all together for you. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | |
|
chamferophile
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 531
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I first tried rendering in 3DSM frames 0-100,102-130 but that didn't work, the I tried 0-100: al went well
then 101-130 and it crashed again... So I will try 102 - 130 when I find the time thx for your patience |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
the darkest knight
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 426
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Saber: Here's a suggestion, in case this is an issue of resources on your computer: split the animation into 2 files. The first one only has the objects you need to render up to frame 100 (so get rid of mesh2 and anything else that is not visible up to that point). The second file only has the objects you need from frame 101 on (and get rid of all the objects that turn invisible, like mesh1). It should lower the file sizes, the number of meshes, etc... and perhaps will be renderable.
If everything is lined up properly, and all your render settings are the same between the two files, it should be just as seamless as if it was all rendered from the same file. If it still crashes, try exporting the things you need for the second part, perhaps there's some sort of file corruption. Good luck, hope it all works out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 531
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Ok, I just started all over again and it kind a worked,
although I still have a problem: you still see the reflection tryout viewable at : http://users.skynet.be/michael_trits...021%20LAVA.avi |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Reputation beyond repute
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,612
Thanks: 136
Thanked 144 Times in 116 Posts
|
its fine, plus when you add in other smaller bubbles, it will take away from anything you don't want focus on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 531
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
other smaller bubbles are best done the same way? by morphers?
and I know the form of the bubble and the transition still suck, the form is easy editable, and about the transition...I hope u are right and the smaller ones take away attention from it. I'm in the exams right now, so i don't know for sure if I'l find the time... but proly I will Thx for all the help |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
paradigm
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 89
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
YEAH, this sounds like a great animation challenge, I have started working out some ideas for my lava lamp, so I hope I can get the work IŽve been imagine since I red this challenge, so everybody GOOD LOOK
XYZ - your one is looking great, this is my first time in animation challenge so hope to hear your comments (when IŽll upload it) as you do in my modelling challenges!! good look man
__________________
![]() Speed Modelling Challenge: Honrable Mentions: Mailbox - Farm Duck Super hero equipment Outdoor grill #1 Robotina Grill WIP Alienware computer |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|