>: CG Forums on 3dtotal - The best forums for CG artists :.
threedy forums home
 


top-table-gradient
Go Back   3DTotal Forums > Help, Advice and Chat > General software and hardware help
bottom-table-gradient

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29-06-2008, 11:31 PM   #1
eiadahnim
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 53
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Best 3D Workstations

Hi everyone,

I'm planning to buy a New Workstation!
I need a good advice on computer that can handle heavy mesh with ease & smooth motion.

I have heard that AMD opetron Quad Core is the best in 3D graphics, is that true?
I have a previous experience in collecting computer parts


any advice?
eiadahnim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-06-2008, 03:12 AM   #2
--Strattus--
Max Mad Man
 
--Strattus--'s Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: São Paulo - Brazil
Posts: 1,162
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Awards Showcase
Threedy Top Poster - Silver: Contributing to the forums with 1,000+ posts - Issue reason: Target reached! Threedy Top Poster - Bronze: Contributing to the forums with 100+ posts - Issue reason: Target reached! 
Total Awards: 2
Depends on how cutting edge you wanna go.
For a general purpouse PC, that is, good 3d rendering at an affordable price, I'd stick with an Intel + Nvidia combination. Something around a Q9450, which is a very cheap quad-core amazingly overclockable processor and a 9800GTX +, also very cheap, DX10 capable, and very fast. With growing physX techonolgy, Nvidia is once more becoming faster than ATI(AMD), for it now has integrated Physics into the GPU, rather than loading it all to the CPU.

BUT, if you want something more robust, mind-blowing, you can always go for professional stuff. That is, replacing those with dual-processor platforms, and adding up a Geforce Quadro to the mix. Quadros deal with polygons like no other card in the world, but it has it's price...a very salty price.
There is also professional 3d workstation resellers, such as BOXX. They have some pretty good stuff if you want to go crazy on speed and capability there.

My personal recommendation: Stick to the basic. Even if you need 2 nice "Gaming" sort of PC, I think it's still better and more affordable than professional tools, and they will deliver similar performance.

Well, I hope this little thing helps you in any way ^^
Good luck!

Last edited by --Strattus--; 30-06-2008 at 10:33 PM..
--Strattus-- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-06-2008, 02:33 PM   #3
eiadahnim
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 53
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by --Strattus-- View Post
Depend on how cutting edge you wanna go.
For a general purpouse PC, that is, good 3d rendering at an affordable price, I'd stick with an Intel + Nvidia combination. Something around a Q9450, which is a very cheap quad-core amazingly overclockable processor and a 9800GTX +, also very cheap, DX10 capable, and very fast. With growing physX techonolgy, Nvidia is once more becoming faster than ATI(AMD), for it now has integrated Physics into the GPU, rather than loading it all to the CPU.

BUT, if you want something more robust, mind-blowing, you can always go for professional stuff. That is, replacing those with dual-processor platforms, and adding up a Geforce Quadro to the mix. Quadros deal with polygons like no other card in the world, but it has it's price...a very salty price.
There is also professional 3d workstation resellers, such as BOXX. They have some pretty good stuff if you want to go crazy on speed and capability there.

My personal recommendation: Stick to the basic. Even if you need 2 nice "Gaming" sort of PC, I think it's still better and more affordable than professional tools, and they will deliver similar performance.

Well, I hope this little thing helps you in any way ^^
Good luck!

Oh Thank you so much --Strattus--

I like it when you were talking about the "Intel + Nvidia combination" can you go more specific. Because there are nvidia GPU or SLI & I have no idea where those can fit.

can you specify at least
processor "?"
memory "ecc or none ecc"
motherboard "?"
hdd "72,000 rpm or 100,000 rpm "
any other things


regards
eiadahnim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-06-2008, 10:25 PM   #4
--Strattus--
Max Mad Man
 
--Strattus--'s Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: São Paulo - Brazil
Posts: 1,162
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Awards Showcase
Threedy Top Poster - Silver: Contributing to the forums with 1,000+ posts - Issue reason: Target reached! Threedy Top Poster - Bronze: Contributing to the forums with 100+ posts - Issue reason: Target reached! 
Total Awards: 2
Ok, as for a processor, in that configuration I told you, you could go for a Q9450, which is very cheap and fast, or for a QX9770 if you want real power.
This is a smal price table, with some average prices:
QX9770 3,2GHz 1600MHz 2x 6MB 136W Q1 '08 $1399
QX9650 3,0GHz 1333MHz 2x 6MB 130W 12-11 $999
Q9550 2,83GHz 1333MHz 2x 6MB 95W Q1 '08 $530
Q9450 2,66GHz 1333MHz 2x 6MB 95W Q1 '08 $316
Q9300 2,5GHz 1333MHz 2x 3MB 95W Q1 '08 $266

I'd still pick the Q9450 though.

As for graphics card, I'd stick to the Geforce 9800GTX +, coming out this year. Again, there are more 3d-specific cards such as Quadros, the 5600 for instance. But those are well over 1.750 pounds...

So final recomendation:
Processor: Q9450
GFX: 9800GTX+ (Still gotta wait a bit for this)
Memmory: for heavy rendering, 4GB of RAM is enough. 1066 if possible.
Motherboard:Asus Striker II (Nforce 780i)
HDD: 500GB 7.200RPM
Nice cooler (could be the BOX one, but this one makes it "overclockable")

And this configuration would add up to about $1,325, at www.ibuypower.com
Its a full PC (exept for the OS, which is not included) and will work brilliantly both as a workstation and gaming platform. When I say gaming platform, it is not exactly for playing games, but can also be quite useful on developing them.
--Strattus-- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 08:28 PM   #5
DigitalPutty
Im a poly pusher. Sweet.
 
DigitalPutty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 686
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Awards Showcase
Threedy Top Poster - Bronze: Contributing to the forums with 100+ posts - Issue reason: Target reached! 
Total Awards: 1
Mmmmmmmmmmmm. Sounds sexah!
__________________
DigitalPutty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2008, 04:38 PM   #6
eiadahnim
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 53
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Wow --Strattus-- That was awesome man,

I have went to www.ibuypower.com they have what I was looking to.

Now, for the tablet. Should I buy the WACOM Cintque version of tablet or just the regular one based on your experience.

Thanks,
eiadahnim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 02:46 AM   #7
--Strattus--
Max Mad Man
 
--Strattus--'s Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: São Paulo - Brazil
Posts: 1,162
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Awards Showcase
Threedy Top Poster - Silver: Contributing to the forums with 1,000+ posts - Issue reason: Target reached! Threedy Top Poster - Bronze: Contributing to the forums with 100+ posts - Issue reason: Target reached! 
Total Awards: 2
Well, basically you need to keep in mind wherther you use it extremely often or not. If you use it pretty much as your mice, I'd suggest you to take the Cintque version. If not, well, you could even take a Genius one.
I have an 8x6 Genius tablet, and I have to say.. it works. ^^
--Strattus-- is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
all images displayed on this site are copyright the original artists and may not be reproduced, copied or published elsewhere without their express permission