|
|||||
|
|
#16 |
|
Kujoe Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manchester England
Posts: 237
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hi super fast modellers... to get faster at speed modelling would I be right in thinking I need to move away from box modelling and become more familiar with spline modelling, most of the work I’ve seen here seems to be extruding shapes? Any help would be most appreciated.
__________________
... Novice Max User ... |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
ʘὦʘ →
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 982
Thanks: 119
Thanked 138 Times in 132 Posts
|
Sinbad: Check out Grant Warwicks hard surface essentials... this video will work magic for you
![]() http://vimeo.com/10941211 |
|
|
|
| GreatastroAJ! Thank you: | Sinbad (13-10-2011) |
|
|
#18 |
|
aka Nehumanuscrede
|
I don't think Spline modeling is any faster ( quite the opposite in my opinion ) but it is better suited towards certain objects than others.
I really enjoy Rhino as it is incredibly powerful ( most disregard it because it's ONLY Nurbs ) and very easy to use. Technically, I could model in Sub D, but it takes me a LOT longer because I have to concentrate on keeping the mesh clean. Also, since Softimage ( my poly modeler of choice ) is horrible at both Nurbs and Booleans, I have to shift gears in my brain and rethink how I would build an item as it requires a very different approach than Nurbs / Splines do. ( My opinion of course ) Usually, I'll brainstorm for a while when considering how to model something to determine which app I'll use to do it. If it's an organic subject my path is easy. I get Zbrush up. Sculpt till I'm happy, then drop it into Topogun so I can re-topo the mesh into something that won't bring Softimage to its knees. Import it, and work from there. Oh and just so you know. . . . While it may look like we blast through this stuff in record time, there is a lot of prep / planning to do. Before I start any model, I'll sit down and work out how I'm going to go about building it. Make sure what I think will work, actually WILL work or not. Once I have the steps laid out ( and it's pretty damned important especially in Nurbs / Spline modeling ) then I will start the clock and get hot. By that point you can blast through it because you're not guessing what you should be doing. You know the order things should happen in, and you won't model yourself into black hole. ( Where you hope Ctrl-Z has enough memory to back up enough ) Even then, it sometimes takes me 2-3 tries to get a model done in time. Because, even with pre-planning, the software will occasionally throw you a curve ball. Sometimes the trims don't work right. Or an edge fillet goes nuts, or a system lock up will happen exactly one quarter of a second before you save your progress . . . :| Not to mention I occasionally bite off more than I can chew. Yeah, I can model that . . . . . . an hour passes . . . . . . . hmmm . . . . damn. . . apparently not ![]()
__________________
The insane do not question their sanity . . . Last edited by Daye; 13-10-2011 at 04:59 AM.. |
|
|
|
| GreatDaye! Thank you: | Sinbad (13-10-2011) |
|
|
#19 |
|
Reliable Moderator
|
I've said this a few times over the years but i'll say it again. What Daye says is exactly true and is common with alot of modellers process who participate on this challenges. There is no wrong or right way to delve into the challenges, some people will prefer to use splines... convert them to editable polys and go from there, others may prefer to model from a primitive shape and then edit that shape with several chamfers, extrudes, fillets, bevels and knife cuts here and there. Some might like using a combination of both.... the fact is 99.9% will go with what they know and what they are most comfortable with.
Knowing your software of choice is key here but for real time saving, knowing your shortcut keys and items such as mirroring/symmetry objects can be real time savers. Familarity with the software comes with playing around time and time again and the notion practice makes perfect has never been so true. In this case it can genuinly benefit your modelling times. Another key element as Daye said is pre planning, for me this is essential! When i start a speed model i will already have a good idea in my head backed up with trial runs, sketches and as many high res reference images as i can get. But don't get disheartened if you cannot get a model finished in time, this is what the challenge is all about it's not meant to be too easy it is after all a challenge, i myself struggled to get all the detailing i wanted done for both my starter and my second entry, but it's about having a go in the first place that counts, never be afraid of posting your unfinshed entries..... it's still and entry after all regardless of what you personally might think about your efforts it's good to share and members constructive critism is invaluable in improving your modelling etc. There isn't a single member on this site that didn't start out crap, we all had to learn and practice, and the more you do it the more natural it will be to knock out a highly detailed masterpeice in the given timeframe. So what you waiting for? Go get modelling and show us what you can do ![]()
__________________
iMac|Lion OSX|Cinema 4D R12|Photoshop CS4| My New Portfolio My Blog (Now with Free Models) |
|
|
|
| GreatClassicGamer-3DT! Thank you: | Sinbad (13-10-2011) |
|
|
#20 |
|
Kujoe Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manchester England
Posts: 237
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thanks allot guys I really appreciate your help and advice that you’re giving;
it’s been a while since I last did some serious modelling... I’m a little rusty but over the coming weeks/months hopefully I will have modelled something worthy of your praise... THX..again...
__________________
... Novice Max User ... |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Kujoe Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manchester England
Posts: 237
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
... Novice Max User ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
constantly impressed
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hey all, first time doing one of these, hope it's OK. The model isn't UV'd, and I used 3D projected textures. Oh well, I had great fun doing it! This one is based (generally) on a Gabel Kuro jukebox. edit: I forgot to have the glass bit in the wireframe render, so it's the half transparent bit now.
Modeled in Maya / Rendered using Mental Ray Modeling time 59 minutes (from 5:30 to 6:29) Texture time 20 minutes Render time : 30 minutes Lighting / Camera: 3 Point, AO, GI, FG, Bokeh DOF Last edited by Chrix; 14-10-2011 at 04:22 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Reliable Moderator
|
Chrix - That's a great model with good clean wireframes and a sweet render we done.
Out most of the day today so won't get back home till around 6pm then will have to sort out tonight's smc.
__________________
iMac|Lion OSX|Cinema 4D R12|Photoshop CS4| My New Portfolio My Blog (Now with Free Models) |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Reliable Moderator
|
OK this challenge is now over. The next challenge is live and ready to go
![]()
__________________
iMac|Lion OSX|Cinema 4D R12|Photoshop CS4| My New Portfolio My Blog (Now with Free Models) |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 301
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Reliable Moderator
|
__________________
iMac|Lion OSX|Cinema 4D R12|Photoshop CS4| My New Portfolio My Blog (Now with Free Models) |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|