>: CG Forums on 3dtotal - The best forums for CG artists :.
threedy forums home
 


top-table-gradient
Go Back   3DTotal Forums > The Creative Ones > 3D - 'Work In Progress - Inorganic models/scenes'
bottom-table-gradient

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-11-2011, 07:04 PM   #1
Shadowhisperer
Registered User
 
Shadowhisperer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: I am Canadian. nuff said
Posts: 21
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Terran Mercenary Goliath

This is the result of an experiment that was a complete success! Essential I imported the fully textured Mercenary Goliath game model from Starcraft II into 3DS Max 2012 and used it as a base reference for blocking out the innitial proportions. I then moved the low poly game model off to the side then used its 2D textures as reference for modeling all the detail before deleting it from the scene!



I am very proud of the resulting model and cannot wait to start texturing it! The one problem however is... it is 7000k polygons.



Essentially I modeled every last detail because it was so much damn fun but the chances of a studio using a 3D model this dense is next too nill. Even with no subdivision the sheer detail puts the model at 1.1 million polys. However in the coming month as I texture its 140+ objects, 500+ elements. I hope to bring its poly count down to hopefully 2 million at the most.

I will render some closeups of the really detailed parts later after school so that they can be seen better so that I can get a better critique. So what do you think, what could I improve on, and any tips for modeling high amounts of detail without going off the ball in terms of poly counts? Also what do you think of the concept of importing game models directly into 3DS Max to use as on an demand reference in the absence of orthographic 2D sheets?

Thanx.

P.S. None of the game model's geometry was used in the construction of this.
Attached Images
 

Last edited by Shadowhisperer; 02-11-2011 at 10:39 PM..
Shadowhisperer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2011, 10:36 PM   #2
Shadowhisperer
Registered User
 
Shadowhisperer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: I am Canadian. nuff said
Posts: 21
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Got the detail shots. Also it appears I did not turn off the subdivision of every object and my model then comes to 390,000 polys instead of 1.1 million.

Shadowhisperer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2011, 12:44 AM   #3
parleee
Canadian, eh?
 
parleee's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Manisnowba
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 32
Thanked 37 Times in 35 Posts
Awards Showcase
Threedy Top Poster - Silver: Contributing to the forums with 1,000+ posts - Issue reason: Target reached! Threedy Top Poster - Bronze: Contributing to the forums with 100+ posts - Issue reason: Target reached! The Golden Eye: Producing art worthy of being linked from the frontpage of either forums or 3DTotal.com - Issue reason: roducing art worthy of being linked from the frontpage of the forums! The Golden Eye: Producing art worthy of being linked from the frontpage of either forums or 3DTotal.com - Issue reason: Producing art worthy of being linked from the frontpage of the forums! 
Total Awards: 4
Not bad, clays have some excessive creases, and it could do with quite a bit more detail, but it's a good start.

Also, by detail I don't mean more paneling, paneling is cool, but it really doesn't add much to the model. Even if you're using an established concept as a base, you'd be better served to build a small number of complex, interesting parts, than a large number of simple parts with tons of small detail on top of it. If the overall shape is boring, people won't want to look close and see all the little glitter. Form is infinitely more important than detail. Try to keep just about everything to curved, or at least angled shapes. Perfectly flat-sided models are a bad idea, as most of the surface detail you labour to create just get eaten up by big spec highlights anyway.

Try to keep your poly-size more consistent too. A lot of the simple pipes on the guns are way denser than they need to be. (Try to avoid repetitive detail too, it's a bit boring.) Just get into the habit of optimizing as you go and you'll be fine.

All in all it's a promising model, keep it up.
__________________
Rawr?

Looking for work. *
http://vimeo.com/27518412

my panhead model, free to use for credited, non-commercial work.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/z086qvlg33h42rg/panhead.zip
parleee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2011, 02:04 AM   #4
Shadowhisperer
Registered User
 
Shadowhisperer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: I am Canadian. nuff said
Posts: 21
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thankyou for the info. I was thinking it could have used a little somethng and now that you put it into plain words I can begin to work on that.

Thanx!
Shadowhisperer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
goliath, mech, mercenary, starcraft, terran


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
all images displayed on this site are copyright the original artists and may not be reproduced, copied or published elsewhere without their express permission